Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether bail should be granted in a GST investigation where the accused was re-arrested during continuing inquiry, and whether the departmental material justified continued custody.
Analysis: The accused had earlier been enlarged on bail and had secured a substantial part of the alleged tax exposure by cash deposits, blocked credit and title deeds. The inquiry was still continuing, no complaint had yet been filed, and the departmental claim of non-cooperation did not justify a fresh arrest without first seeking cancellation of the earlier bail. The order also emphasises that bail is governed by the principle that personal liberty should not be curtailed unless custody is necessary to secure attendance, prevent interference with evidence, or meet other compelling grounds.
Conclusion: Bail was held to be justified and the accused was entitled to release on the terms imposed.
Final Conclusion: The application was allowed, and the accused was admitted to bail subject to conditions to join investigation, avoid tampering with evidence, and not leave the country without permission.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an accused is already on bail, a fresh arrest during ongoing investigation is not justified merely for non-cooperation; the proper course is to seek cancellation of bail, and pre-trial custody cannot be maintained when substantial security for the alleged liability has already been furnished.