https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398906 In a GST investigation, continued custody was considered unnecessary where the accused was already on bail, the inquiry was still ongoing, no complaint had been filed, and substantial security for the alleged liability had already been furnished through cash deposits, blocked credit and title deeds. The text states that a fresh arrest for alleged non-cooperation was not justified without first seeking cancellation of the earlier bail, because pre-trial detention should be used only where necessary to secure attendance, prevent interference with evidence, or meet other compelling grounds. Bail was therefore treated as justified, subject to conditions to join the investigation, avoid tampering with evidence, and not leave the country without permission. en-us Thu, 24 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Mar 2025 17:01:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398906 In a GST investigation, continued custody was considered unnecessary where the accused was already on bail, the inquiry was still ongoing, no complaint had been filed, and substantial security for the alleged liability had already been furnished through cash deposits, blocked credit and title deeds. The text states that a fresh arrest for alleged non-cooperation was not justified without first seeking cancellation of the earlier bail, because pre-trial detention should be used only where necessary to secure attendance, prevent interference with evidence, or meet other compelling grounds. Bail was therefore treated as justified, subject to conditions to join the investigation, avoid tampering with evidence, and not leave the country without permission. Case-Laws GST Thu, 24 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398906