Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a direction should be issued to the Revenue to decide the petitioner's applications seeking refund under Section 119(2)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 within a fixed time.
Analysis: The petition was confined to a limited prayer for disposal of the pending applications. The Court did not adjudicate the merits of the refund claim, the limitation objection, or the maintainability question, and left all rights and contentions open. In view of the long pendency and the restricted relief sought, the Court considered it appropriate to direct the respondent to decide the applications in accordance with law within a specified period.
Conclusion: A time-bound direction was issued to the respondent to decide the petitioner's applications within eight weeks in accordance with law.