<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 631 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396962</link>
    <description>The Court confined relief to disposal of pending refund applications under Section 119(2)(b) of the Income-tax Act and did not examine the merits of the refund claim, limitation objection, or maintainability. Taking note of the long pendency and the limited prayer, it directed the Revenue to decide the applications in accordance with law within eight weeks, while leaving all rights and contentions open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2020 10:42:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=618464" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 631 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396962</link>
      <description>The Court confined relief to disposal of pending refund applications under Section 119(2)(b) of the Income-tax Act and did not examine the merits of the refund claim, limitation objection, or maintainability. Taking note of the long pendency and the limited prayer, it directed the Revenue to decide the applications in accordance with law within eight weeks, while leaving all rights and contentions open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396962</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>