Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2020 (5) TMI 464 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal decision: Non-compete fees not taxable, deduction claim rejected, sale consideration taxable. The Tribunal upheld the reopening of the assessment under Section 147, determined that non-compete fees were not taxable for the relevant assessment year, ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal decision: Non-compete fees not taxable, deduction claim rejected, sale consideration taxable.

                            The Tribunal upheld the reopening of the assessment under Section 147, determined that non-compete fees were not taxable for the relevant assessment year, rejected a deduction claim for payment to Indian Bank, and held that the entire sale consideration for shares was taxable. The appeals were partly allowed.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Legality of reopening the concluded assessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
                            2. Taxability of non-compete fees received by the assessee.
                            3. Deduction of payment made to Indian Bank under the claim of diversion by overriding title.
                            4. Taxability of the amount not received by the assessee from the total consideration.

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Legality of Reopening the Concluded Assessment:
                            The assessee filed the original return of income on 28.03.2002, which was processed under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Revenue reopened the assessment under Section 147 within four years from the end of the assessment year, issuing a notice under Section 148 on 30.03.2006. The assessee challenged the reopening, arguing that there was no fresh tangible material available to justify the reopening. The Tribunal held that the reopening was valid as the return was not originally scrutinized under Section 143(3), and the Revenue had tangible material indicating that the income had escaped assessment. The Tribunal relied on the Supreme Court's decision in Rajesh Jhaveri Stock Brokers Private Limited, which allows reopening of assessments processed under Section 143(1) if there are reasons to believe that income has escaped assessment.

                            2. Taxability of Non-Compete Fees:
                            The assessee received Rs. 7.5 crores as non-compete fees for agreeing not to compete with the company Kris Srikanth Sports Entertainment Private Limited for six years. The Tribunal held that the non-compete fees were not taxable for the assessment year 2001-02, as the amendment to Section 28 (inserting clause (va)) by the Finance Act, 2002, which made non-compete fees taxable, was applicable from 01.04.2003. The Tribunal relied on the Supreme Court's decision in Guffic Chem Private Limited, which held that non-compete fees received before the amendment were capital receipts and not taxable.

                            3. Deduction of Payment to Indian Bank:
                            The assessee claimed a deduction of Rs. 4.25 crores paid to Indian Bank under the claim of diversion by overriding title. The Tribunal rejected this claim, holding that the payment was an application of income and not a diversion by overriding title. The shares of Kris Srikanth Sports Entertainment Private Limited were not subject to any charge by Indian Bank, and the payment was made under a compromise agreement to settle a loan availed by Aditya Leather Exports Private Limited, where the assessee was a director and guarantor. The Tribunal held that the payment was not incurred wholly and exclusively in connection with the transfer of shares and thus could not be deducted under Section 48(1).

                            4. Taxability of Amount Not Received:
                            The assessee claimed that Rs. 3 crores out of the total consideration of Rs. 15 crores was not received and should not be taxed. The Tribunal held that the entire sale consideration of Rs. 7.5 crores for the shares was received and should be taxed. The Tribunal rejected the claim that the non-receipt of Rs. 3 crores should be attributed to the sale of shares, as the shares were fully transferred, and the consideration was agreed upon. The Tribunal also noted that the assessee did not take any legal action to recover the unpaid amount, indicating that the entire sale consideration was effectively received.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Tribunal upheld the reopening of the assessment under Section 147, held that the non-compete fees were not taxable for the assessment year 2001-02, rejected the deduction of Rs. 4.25 crores paid to Indian Bank, and held that the entire sale consideration of Rs. 7.5 crores for the shares was taxable. The appeals were partly allowed.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found