Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether reassessment under section 147(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was valid when the internal audit party pointed out that the charitable trust's recognition had expired before the relevant accounting years, affecting deduction under section 80G.
Analysis: The earlier assessment had allowed deduction on donations to a charitable trust on the footing that it was recognised. The internal audit party later pointed out that the trust's recognition had expired before the relevant years, which meant the deduction had been wrongly allowed. The point noted by the audit party was a factual omission in the assessment and not an opinion on a question of law. Information supplied by the audit party that exposes a factual mistake or overlooked fact can constitute valid information for reopening under section 147(b).
Conclusion: Reopening under section 147(b) was valid in law, and the view that such audit information could not justify reassessment was . The issue was decided in favour of the Revenue.
Final Conclusion: The appeals succeeded, and the reassessment based on factual information supplied by the internal audit party was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Information from an internal audit party revealing a factual mistake or overlooked fact in the original assessment can validly form the basis for reopening under section 147(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.