Deemed public issue of redeemable preference shares triggers prospectus, listing and refund obligations, with directors facing joint liability.

An offer of redeemable preference shares to 4,191 allottees exceeded the statutory threshold for a deemed public issue under the Companies Act, 1956. As a public issue, the company was required to comply with prospectus, disclosure, registration, listing and refund obligations; the absence of such compliance constituted violations of Sections 56(1), 56(3), 60 and 73. The company and directors in charge were treated as liable for refund with interest and faced consequential regulatory restraints and compliance directions, while one noticee was given the benefit of doubt on resignation and another restraint was made conditional on production of a competent authority's order.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the company made an offer of redeemable preference shares to the public. (ii) Whether the offer of redeemable preference shares violated the public issue and disclosure requirements under the Companies Act, 1956. (iii) Who were liable for the violations and what consequential directions were warranted.

Issue (i): Whether the company made an offer of redeemable preference shares to the public.

Analysis: The material on record showed issuance of redeemable preference shares to 4,191 allottees during the relevant financial years and mobilisation of substantial funds. An offer to fifty persons or more attracted the first proviso to Section 67(3) of the Companies Act, 1956 and was to be treated as a public issue. The company did not dispute the offer, and the number of allottees clearly exceeded the statutory threshold.

Conclusion: The company made a public issue of redeemable preference shares.

Issue (ii): Whether the offer of redeemable preference shares violated the public issue and disclosure requirements under the Companies Act, 1956.

Analysis: Once the offer was treated as a public issue, the company was required to comply with the prospectus, registration, listing and refund requirements under Sections 56(1), 56(3), 60 and 73 of the Companies Act, 1956, read with Section 2(36) and the corresponding listing framework. No material was produced to show registration of a prospectus, compliance with disclosure requirements, application for listing, or maintenance of the mandated separate account. The statutory consequence of non-listing and non-compliance with refund obligations followed.

Conclusion: The offer violated Sections 56(1), 56(3), 60, 73(1), 73(2) and 73(3) of the Companies Act, 1956.

Issue (iii): Who were liable for the violations and what consequential directions were warranted.

Analysis: The directors who were in charge during the relevant period were treated as officers in default, and joint and several liability to refund the collections with interest was imposed. The rate of interest was taken at 15% per annum. One noticee was given the benefit of doubt on the evidence regarding resignation, and another noticee's restraint was linked to production of a competent authority's order on the forgery allegation. SEBI's powers under the securities law were invoked to direct refund, asset disclosure, escrow handling, public notice, market restraint and recovery upon default.

Conclusion: The company and the identified directors were held liable for refund with interest and were subjected to consequential market restraints and compliance directions, while one noticee's liability was revoked and another's restraint was made conditional.

Final Conclusion: The proceedings resulted in findings of a deemed public issue, multiple violations of the Companies Act, 1956, and enforcement directions requiring refund, disclosure, and market prohibition against the responsible noticees.

Ratio Decidendi: An offer of securities made to fifty persons or more by a public company is a deemed public issue, and failure to comply with the attendant prospectus, listing and refund obligations renders the company and its officers in default jointly and severally liable to refund the collections with interest and face regulatory restraint.

---