Orion Industries Ordered to Refund Investors with 15% Interest for Illegal Share Issue; Directors Banned from Market for 4 Years.

The Company, identified as Orion Industries Limited, issued Redeemable Preference Shares (RPS) in violation of Sections 56, 60, and 73 of the Companies Act, 1956. The directors involved are held jointly and severally liable to refund the collected amount with 15% interest per annum. They must disclose assets, issue public notices, and complete refunds within three months. They are also restrained from accessing the securities market for four years post-refund. Directions against one director are revoked, while another has 365 days to contest allegations. SEBI retains jurisdiction to enforce compliance and may pursue further actions.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Whether the Company came out with the Offer of Redeemable Preference Shares (RPS) as stated in the Interim Order.
2. If the answer to Issue No. 1 is affirmative, whether the Offer of RPS is in violation of Section 56, Section 60, and Section 73 of the Companies Act, 1956.
3. If the findings on Issue No. 2 are affirmative, who are liable for the violations committed.

Detailed Analysis:

Issue No. 1: Whether the Company came out with the Offer of RPS as stated in the Interim OrderRs.
- Observation: The Company, Orion Industries Limited (OIL), issued RPS to 4,191 investors during the financial years 2011-12 and 2012-13, raising a total amount of Rs. 5,46,48,000. This was not disputed by the company or its directors.
- Conclusion: OIL indeed came out with an Offer of RPS as outlined in the Interim Order.

Issue No. 2: If the answer to Issue No. 1 is affirmative, whether the Offer of RPS is in violation of Section 56, Section 60, and Section 73 of Companies Act, 1956Rs.
- Public Issue Determination: The Offer of RPS to 4,191 investors qualifies as a public issue under Section 67(3) of the Companies Act, 1956, as it was made to more than 50 persons.
- Non-Compliance:
- Section 56 and 60: OIL failed to register a prospectus with the RoC and did not issue a prospectus containing the necessary disclosures.
- Section 73: OIL did not apply for listing the securities on a recognized stock exchange and did not refund the amounts collected from investors.
- Conclusion: The Offer of RPS by OIL violated Sections 56(1), 56(3), 60, 73(1), 73(2), and 73(3) of the Companies Act, 1956.

Issue No. 3: If the findings on Issue No. 2 are affirmative, who are liable for the violations committedRs.
- Directors' Liability:
- Md Mahfuz Alam, Parwez Alam, Md Kamal Koshar, Mohammad Salimuddin Ansari, Manzur Alam, Punam Bharati: As directors during the issuance of RPS, they are jointly and severally liable for the violations.
- Mohammed Afaque Ahmad: Resigned effective March 15, 2012, and given the benefit of doubt due to lack of evidence of collection during his tenure. Directions against him are revoked.
- Santanu Sen Choudhury: Alleged forgery of his signatures; given 365 days to obtain an appropriate order from a competent authority. Directions against him will not take effect until then.
- Conclusion: The aforementioned directors are responsible for ensuring refunds with interest to the investors.

Directions Issued:
1. Refund and Interest: Md Mahfuz Alam, Parwez Alam, Md Kamal Koshar, Mohammad Salimuddin Ansari, Manzur Alam, and Punam Bharati shall jointly and severally with OIL refund the money collected through RPS with an interest of 15% per annum.
2. Repayment Method: Refunds to be made through Bank Demand Draft or Pay Order, crossed as "Non-Transferable".
3. Asset Disclosure: Directors to provide a full inventory of all assets and properties and details of all bank accounts and demat accounts.
4. Sale of Assets: Directors permitted to sell the company's assets for refund purposes and deposit proceeds in an Escrow Account.
5. Public Notice: Directors to issue a public notice detailing the refund modalities within 15 days.
6. Completion Report: Directors to file a report of refund completion, certified by two independent Chartered Accountants, within three months.
7. Market Restraint: Directors are restrained from accessing the securities market and associating with any public company intending to raise money from the public for four years from the date of refund completion.
8. Santanu Sen Choudhury: Restraint on accessing the securities market for four years; directions to take effect after 365 days if no favorable order from a competent authority is produced.
9. Revocation for Mohammed Afaque Ahmad: Directions against him are revoked.
10. Immediate Effect: All directions except for Santanu Sen Choudhury's market restraint to come into force immediately.

Additional Notes:
- SEBI's Jurisdiction: SEBI has the authority to administer the relevant provisions of the Companies Act concerning the issue and transfer of securities for public companies.
- Further Action: SEBI may initiate further actions under securities laws as deemed appropriate for the violations committed by the directors.

---