ITAT allows appeal on finance lease; penalty set aside under section 271(1)(c) of I.T. Act

The ITAT allowed the appeal regarding the disallowance of principal payments towards a finance lease, recognizing them as revenue expenditure. The ITAT set aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the I.T. Act, 1961, remanding the matter to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision with detailed reasoning and a fair hearing to the assessee.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance of Rs. 50,09,835/- recognized as principal payments made towards finance lease.
2. Levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the I.T. Act, 1961.

Issue 1: Disallowance of Rs. 50,09,835/- towards finance lease

The assessee, a Public Limited Company engaged in Information Technology Education and Knowledge Solutions, filed a return of income for the A.Y. 2009-2010. The A.O. disallowed the deduction of Rs. 50,09,835/- claimed as principal payments towards a finance lease, treating it as capital expenditure. The assessee argued that the lease payments were for infrastructure/movable assets located at three centers and, as per Accounting Standard AS-19, recognized as finance lease. The principal payments were capitalized, while finance charges were expensed. The assessee contended that the entire lease rent should be deductible as it was for business use, citing various judgments and CBDT circulars supporting the treatment of lease rentals as revenue expenditure.

The CIT(A) upheld the A.O.'s decision, referencing the ITAT's decision in Rio Tinto India Pvt. Ltd. The assessee reiterated that similar claims were allowed in previous years (A.Ys. 2007-2008 and 2008-2009) and other judgments supported their position. The ITAT noted that the assessee used the leased infrastructure exclusively for business purposes and was not the owner of the assets. The principle of consistency was emphasized, as similar claims were allowed in earlier years. The ITAT concluded that the lease rentals were revenue expenditures and allowed the assessee's appeal, deleting the addition.

Issue 2: Levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the I.T. Act, 1961

The A.O. levied a penalty on the assessee for Rs. 90,83,882/- based on additions of Rs. 50,09,835/- (finance lease) and Rs. 40,73,987/- (long term capital gains). The CIT(A) confirmed the penalty, as the additions were upheld in the quantum appeal. However, the ITAT highlighted that penalty proceedings are distinct from quantum proceedings and require independent reasoning. The ITAT set aside the penalty order and remanded the matter to the CIT(A) for reconsideration, instructing to provide detailed reasons and a fair hearing to the assessee.

Conclusion:

The ITAT allowed the appeal regarding the finance lease deduction, recognizing it as a revenue expenditure. The penalty appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, remanding it to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision with proper reasoning.

---