Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition of Rs. 11,96,600 made on the basis of the rejected VDIS declaration was sustainable or required to be set aside and remitted for fresh consideration.
Analysis: The addition arose from a search assessment under Chapter XIV-B following action under section 132 and notice under section 158BC(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The material facts were found to be materially identical to those in the connected matter of the assessee's brother, where the same VDIS-related claim had been considered and the matter had been restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh decision. In the absence of any distinguishing feature, the same course was followed here, with directions that the Assessing Officer re-examine the particulars of income declared under VDIS 1997 and assess only that part which could validly be brought to tax as undisclosed income under the block assessment scheme.
Conclusion: The impugned addition was set aside and the matter was remitted to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication in accordance with the earlier directions.