<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 483 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385715</link>
    <description>In a search assessment under Chapter XIV-B, an addition based on a rejected VDIS declaration was held not to stand on the existing record because the facts were materially identical to those in the assessee&#039;s brother&#039;s matter, where the same VDIS claim had already been sent back for fresh examination. The impugned addition was set aside and the Assessing Officer was directed to re-examine the particulars declared under VDIS 1997 and bring to tax only that part which could validly constitute undisclosed income under the block assessment scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2019 09:53:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=586909" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 483 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385715</link>
      <description>In a search assessment under Chapter XIV-B, an addition based on a rejected VDIS declaration was held not to stand on the existing record because the facts were materially identical to those in the assessee&#039;s brother&#039;s matter, where the same VDIS claim had already been sent back for fresh examination. The impugned addition was set aside and the Assessing Officer was directed to re-examine the particulars declared under VDIS 1997 and bring to tax only that part which could validly constitute undisclosed income under the block assessment scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385715</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>