Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the corporate debtor's application under Section 10 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was complete and maintainable despite objections based on SARFAESI proceedings and alleged misuse of insolvency process.
Analysis: The application was examined with reference to the statutory scheme governing initiation of corporate insolvency resolution process by a corporate applicant. Once the corporate debtor had committed default and had furnished the prescribed particulars, including the proposed interim resolution professional and the board approval, the adjudicating authority was required to test only completeness of the application and any ineligibility under Section 11 of the Code. The objections founded on pending recovery action under the SARFAESI Act did not constitute a valid ground to admission of a complete Section 10 application. The authority relied on settled principles that, where default exists and no disqualification under Section 11 is shown, admission follows and other collateral objections do not defeat the application.
Conclusion: The application under Section 10 was held to be complete and admissible, and the objections to maintainability were rejected.