Tribunal Admits Petition for Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, Emphasizes Insolvency Resolution Objective

The Tribunal admitted the petition under Section 7 of the Code, finding the requirements fulfilled. It appointed an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) and declared a moratorium to facilitate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). The Financial Creditor's claim of financial debt and default was upheld, and procedural compliance was confirmed. The Tribunal emphasized the objective of resolving insolvency and allowed for the possibility of withdrawal post-admission under Section 12A of the Code.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Authorization to file the petition.
2. Existence of financial debt and default.
3. Discrepancy in the amount claimed.
4. Parallel proceedings and arbitration.
5. Settlement attempts.
6. Compliance with procedural requirements.
7. Appointment of Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) and declaration of moratorium.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Authorization to file the petition:
The Tribunal noted that Mr. Vipin Saroha, Legal Head of the petitioner, was authorized by a Board Resolution dated 14.09.2018 to sign and submit the petition, fulfilling the requirement for authorization.

2. Existence of financial debt and default:
The Financial Creditor lent Rs. 40,40,000 to the Corporate Debtor under a loan agreement dated 27.07.2017. The Corporate Debtor defaulted on several EMIs, prompting the Financial Creditor to recall the loan on 22.03.2018. Despite the recall, defaults continued, and the total amount due as of 14.05.2018 was Rs. 39,20,123. The Tribunal relied on the Supreme Court's judgment in Innoventive Industries Ltd. v. ICICI Bank & Anr., emphasizing that the adjudicating authority only needs to verify the occurrence of default from the records provided by the Financial Creditor.

3. Discrepancy in the amount claimed:
The Corporate Debtor argued discrepancies in the amounts stated in the recall notice and the notice under the Code. The Tribunal referred to its previous judgment in Bank of India v. Tirupati Infraprojects Pvt. Ltd., stating that discrepancies in calculation do not materially affect the admission of the application as long as the default amount exceeds Rs. 1 lakh.

4. Parallel proceedings and arbitration:
The Corporate Debtor contended that the Financial Creditor could not pursue parallel proceedings, including ongoing arbitration. The Tribunal rejected this argument, clarifying that under Section 7 of the Code, the pendency of other proceedings does not bar the initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP).

5. Settlement attempts:
The Corporate Debtor mentioned attempts to settle the dispute, which did not materialize. The Tribunal highlighted that the objective of the Code is to resolve insolvency, which necessitates the admission of the petition. The possibility of withdrawal post-admission under Section 12A of the Code was also noted.

6. Compliance with procedural requirements:
The Tribunal confirmed that the application was complete as per Section 7(2) of the Code and Rule 4(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016. The Financial Creditor provided overwhelming evidence of default, and no disciplinary proceedings were pending against the proposed IRP.

7. Appointment of Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) and declaration of moratorium:
The Tribunal appointed Shri Sunil Prakash as the IRP and directed him to make a public announcement within three days. A moratorium was declared under Section 14 of the Code, prohibiting suits, asset transfers, foreclosure actions, and recovery of property by owners or lessors. Essential supplies were to continue during the moratorium period. The Financial Creditor was directed to deposit Rs. 2 lakhs with the IRP for expenses.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal admitted the petition, finding all requirements of Section 7 of the Code satisfied, including the existence of a financial debt, default, and compliance with procedural norms. The IRP was appointed, and a moratorium was declared to facilitate the CIRP.

---