Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Companies Law

        2019 (5) TMI 606 - AT - Companies Law

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        NCLT upholds share valuation at Rs. 10.35, awards 6% interest. Emphasizes procedural fairness and equity. The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) upheld the valuation report valuing shares at Rs. 10.35 each, rejecting objections raised by the original ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          NCLT upholds share valuation at Rs. 10.35, awards 6% interest. Emphasizes procedural fairness and equity.

                          The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) upheld the valuation report valuing shares at Rs. 10.35 each, rejecting objections raised by the original Petitioners. Interest at 6% per annum was awarded on the share value from April 1, 2007. The NCLT had the authority to modify consent orders for fair outcomes. Procedural fairness and equity were emphasized, directing the Petitioners to sell shares to specific shareholders. The final order directed the sale of shares at the determined price with interest, to be completed within two months, with no costs awarded.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Validity of the Valuation Report.
                          2. Objections to the Valuation Report.
                          3. Grant of Interest on the Share Value.
                          4. Authority of NCLT to Modify Consent Orders.
                          5. Applicability of Section 634-A of the Companies Act, 1956.
                          6. Rights of Shareholders vs. Company in Share Buyback.
                          7. Procedural Fairness and Equity in Tribunal Orders.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Validity of the Valuation Report:
                          The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) had appointed an independent valuer to determine the fair value of the shares of the company as of March 14, 2007. The valuation report dated July 20, 2012, was submitted, valuing the shares at Rs. 10.35 each. The NCLT rejected the objections raised by the original Petitioners to the Valuation Report and directed them to sell their shares at this fair price.

                          2. Objections to the Valuation Report:
                          The original Petitioners raised objections to the Valuation Report, claiming undervaluation of the company's immovable properties and insufficient opportunity to present their case. The NCLT considered these objections but found no fault with the valuation done by the independent valuer. The objections were deemed bona fide but ultimately not persuasive enough to alter the valuation.

                          3. Grant of Interest on the Share Value:
                          The NCLT awarded interest at 9% per annum (simple interest) on the share value from April 1, 2007, until the actual date of payment. The NCLT justified this by stating that the company had utilized the Petitioners' funds during this period. The Appellate Tribunal, while upholding the grant of interest, reduced the rate to 6% per annum to balance the equities between the parties.

                          4. Authority of NCLT to Modify Consent Orders:
                          The Appellant argued that the NCLT acted as an executing court and could not vary the consent order dated April 1, 2011. However, the Tribunal found that the order was not a final decree but an interlocutory order requiring further application of mind by the NCLT. The NCLT had the authority to accept or reject the Valuation Report and make necessary modifications in the interest of justice.

                          5. Applicability of Section 634-A of the Companies Act, 1956:
                          The Appellant contended that under Section 634-A, the NCLT could not go beyond the consent order. The Tribunal noted that the corresponding provision in the new Companies Act, 2013, does not exist, and even under the old Act, the NCLT had the authority to ensure fair and equitable outcomes, which included the power to grant interest.

                          6. Rights of Shareholders vs. Company in Share Buyback:
                          The NCLT's order directed the Petitioners to sell their shares to the Respondents, which included the company and other shareholders. The Appellate Tribunal clarified that the order should specifically direct the sale of shares to the Respondents 2 to 9 (shareholders) and not the company, as the procedural requirements and rights differ significantly.

                          7. Procedural Fairness and Equity in Tribunal Orders:
                          The Tribunal emphasized the need for procedural fairness and equity. It was noted that the original Petitioners had bona fide objections and were not merely delaying the proceedings. The NCLT's decision to grant interest was within its equitable jurisdiction, ensuring that the Petitioners were compensated for the delay in receiving their dues.

                          Final Order:
                          - The Petitioners are directed to sell their entire shareholding to Respondents 2 to 9 at Rs. 10.35 per share.
                          - The Respondents 2 to 9 shall pay the Petitioners the share value along with 6% per annum simple interest from April 1, 2007, until the payment date.
                          - The compliances shall be made before the Bench Officer of the Tribunal within two months.
                          - The appeal is disposed of with no order as to costs.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found