Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the interim status quo order passed in proceedings under Sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013 was liable to be interfered with in view of the pending arbitration and the application under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Analysis: The Tribunal's dominant concern in proceedings for oppression and mismanagement is protection of the company's interest and preservation of its assets. Where an arbitral proceeding is pending and a challenge to maintainability is also before the Tribunal, it may pass protective interim directions to prevent alienation of company property and avoid the petition becoming infructuous. The challenge to maintainability on the basis of arbitration was not decided in this appeal, and the interim order was viewed as a measure to safeguard the company until the rival proceedings were determined.
Conclusion: The conditional status quo order was upheld and no interference was warranted in appeal.
Ratio Decidendi: In proceedings under Sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013, the Tribunal may grant interim protective relief to preserve company assets and protect the company's interest even when arbitration-related issues and a Section 8 challenge are pending.