Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether ad-interim protective relief could be granted restraining dealing with the immovable property covered by the sale deed and maintaining status quo pending the arbitral and company proceedings.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that its interim powers under Section 242(4) of the Companies Act, 2013 are to be exercised in relation to the affairs of the company and on just and equitable considerations. It also applied the settled requirements for interim relief, namely prima facie case, balance of convenience, irreparable injury, and undue hardship. The Tribunal found that parallel proceedings were pending before the arbitral forum and that the parties had already sought similar reliefs there, but it was also concerned that third-party rights were being created in relation to company property before the arbitral decision. In that backdrop, and to protect the company's interest, the Tribunal held that interim preservation of the property was justified.
Conclusion: Status quo was directed in respect of the immovable property covered by the sale deed until the arbitral forum or the jurisdictional objection application was decided, and the remaining interim reliefs were kept pending.