Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the adjudicating authority could sustain findings and penalty on grounds going beyond the show-cause notice, and whether the penalty imposed under FEMA was liable to be interfered with for being excessive and not commensurate with the alleged technical contravention.
Analysis: The proceedings arose from alleged non-compliance with the reporting requirement under Regulation 5(1) of the Foreign Exchange Management (Transfer or Issue of Security by a Person Resident Outside India) Regulations, 2000 read with the FEMA notification governing issue of shares by a person resident outside India. The impugned order, however, was found to have travelled beyond the charge contained in the show-cause notice by adding a further contravention not specifically alleged. Such enlargement of the charge at the stage of adjudication was held to be contrary to the notice and to the principles of natural justice. The Tribunal also found that the penalty imposed was not commensurate with the nature of the alleged contravention and was liable to be modified under Section 13(1) of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999.
Conclusion: The adjudication was held unsustainable to the extent it went beyond the show-cause notice, the penalty was reduced and modified, and the respondent's revision petition was rendered infructuous.