Software right-to-use payments not royalty, while foreign technical and consultancy services remained taxable for withholding purposes.

Payments for erection, commissioning and repair services rendered abroad for wind-power projects were treated as taxable in India as technical or consultancy services, so the withholding obligation and section 201 consequences were sustained. By contrast, consideration paid for software was characterised as a right to use software rather than royalty, and no default for tax deduction at source arose on that payment. Remittance for a wind-energy market study was also treated as taxable in India as consultancy or technical services, including information based on commercial experience, with withholding liability maintained. The appeal thus succeeded only on the software-payment issue.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether payments for erection, commissioning and repair services rendered abroad to foreign entities were taxable in India as fees for technical services or royalty and whether the assessee was liable to deduct tax at source and be treated as an assessee in default under section 201. (ii) Whether payment for purchase of software amounted to royalty so as to attract tax deduction at source and liability under section 201. (iii) Whether remittance for a market study for wind energy rendered abroad was taxable in India as fees for technical services or royalty and therefore subject to tax deduction at source.

Issue (i): Whether payments for erection, commissioning and repair services rendered abroad to foreign entities were taxable in India as fees for technical services or royalty and whether the assessee was liable to deduct tax at source and be treated as an assessee in default under section 201.

Analysis: The payments related to services used for the assessee's turnkey wind-power projects outside India. The Tribunal accepted that the services of foreign personnel were involved in installation and repair of wind turbines and that the lower authorities had rightly examined section 9(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the relevant DTAA provisions. It held that the assessee's business was not carried on entirely outside India and that the impugned payments fell within the taxable category identified by the lower authorities.

Conclusion: The payments for erection, commissioning and repair services were held taxable in India and the assessee was held liable under sections 201(1) and 201(1A); the issue was decided against the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether payment for purchase of software amounted to royalty so as to attract tax deduction at source and liability under section 201.

Analysis: The Tribunal found that the consideration was for purchase of software and, on the facts and the applicable treaty position, the payment was for the right to use software. It held that such consideration did not constitute royalty for the purpose of tax deduction at source.

Conclusion: The software payment was held not taxable as royalty and the assessee was not to be treated as in default; the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

Issue (iii): Whether remittance for a market study for wind energy rendered abroad was taxable in India as fees for technical services or royalty and therefore subject to tax deduction at source.

Analysis: The Tribunal agreed with the lower authorities that the market study constituted consultancy or technical services and also answered to the description of information concerning commercial experience under the relevant treaty provisions. On that basis, the remittance was treated as taxable in India and subject to withholding.

Conclusion: The market-study payment was held taxable and liable for tax deduction at source; the issue was decided against the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded only in part, with relief granted on the software-payment issue and the remaining additions and withholding-tax consequences sustained.

Ratio Decidendi: Consideration for software that is only for the right to use software is not royalty, whereas payments for technical or consultancy services and commercially experienced-based services rendered abroad may be taxable in India under the Act and the applicable treaty provisions if the statutory conditions are satisfied.

---