TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether payments made to foreign entities for crane hire, repair work, and market study services were taxable in India as fee for technical services or royalty and therefore liable to tax deduction at source.
Analysis: The factual findings recorded by the Assessing Officer, the appellate authority, and the Tribunal showed that the work entrusted to the foreign entities was not a mere supply of labour or routine repair, but involved highly skilled and technical functions connected with installation of wind turbines, specialised repair of rotor blades, and technical market study services. The Court declined to reappreciate those contractual and factual findings in an appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in the absence of perversity. It held that the services were correctly characterised as fee for technical services and that the reliance on the relevant DTAA provisions did not alter the result on the facts found.
Conclusion: The payments were taxable and the assessee was liable to deduct tax at source; the findings against the assessee were upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: In an appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, findings that payments to non-residents are fee for technical services are not to be disturbed unless perversity is shown, and such factual characterisation governs taxability and withholding liability under the Act and the applicable DTAA.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
