Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee, being the supplier of inputs to a job worker, was liable to pay central excise duty on scrap generated at the job worker's end and not received back within the stipulated time under the relevant notification and rules.
Analysis: The Court noted that the assessee had already paid duty on the scrap generated at the job worker's factory for the relevant period and that, after 31 March 2000, there was no liability on the principal manufacturer in view of the amended CENVAT credit provisions. On that factual and legal basis, the Court held that no substantial question of law arose for consideration.
Conclusion: The assessee was not liable to pay central excise duty on the scrap in the circumstances considered, and the challenge failed.