CENVAT Credit Rule 4(5)(a) does not fasten duty on principal manufacturers for scrap generated at job workers' premises.

Rule 4(5)(a) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 was treated as a facilitative provision for movement of inputs to a job worker, not a charging provision creating duty liability on the principal manufacturer for waste and scrap generated at the job worker's premises. The Tribunal noted that the issue had already been settled in the appellant's earlier cases and followed that position. On that basis, the principal manufacturer was not liable to pay duty on such waste and scrap, and the impugned order was set aside with consequential relief.

---

---

Issues: Whether the principal manufacturer was liable to pay duty on waste and scrap generated at the job worker's premises under Rule 4(5)(a) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

Analysis: The Tribunal noted that the controversy had already been settled in the appellant's own earlier cases and that the relevant rule did not impose liability on the principal manufacturer for duty on waste and scrap arising at the job worker's end. The rule was treated as a facilitative provision for movement of inputs and not as a charging provision fastening duty liability on the principal manufacturer for scrap generated outside its factory.

Conclusion: The principal manufacturer was not liable to pay duty on the waste and scrap generated at the job worker's premises under Rule 4(5)(a) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The impugned order was set aside and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief.

Ratio Decidendi: Rule 4(5)(a) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 does not create duty liability on the principal manufacturer for waste and scrap generated at the job worker's premises.

---