Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the principal manufacturer was liable to discharge duty on waste and scrap arising at the job worker's factory and cleared by the job worker without payment of duty, where raw materials were sent for conversion under Notification No. 214/86-CE dated 25.3.1986.
Analysis: The dispute was treated as covered by the appellant's own earlier case for an identical period. Following that earlier decision, the demand was found to be unsustainable, and the impugned order was set aside.
Conclusion: The demand on the principal manufacturer in respect of waste and scrap cleared by the job worker without payment of duty was not sustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Where goods are sent to a job worker under Notification No. 214/86-CE, duty cannot be fastened on the principal manufacturer for waste and scrap arising at the job worker's factory and cleared by the job worker without payment of duty.