TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit attributable to inputs contained in waste and scrap generated at the job-worker's premises, and not received back by the principal manufacturer, was required to be reversed.
Analysis: The dispute turned on Rule 4(5)(a) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 and the legal effect of sending inputs for job work. The Tribunal held that the rule required the processed inputs to be received back within the stipulated time, but did not impose any requirement that waste and scrap generated at the job-worker's end must also be returned. It was found that the earlier regime under Rule 57F of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 contained an express stipulation regarding waste and scrap, whereas the later rule deliberately omitted such a requirement. The Tribunal also relied on the settled view that waste and scrap generated at the job-worker's premises cannot be treated as dutiable in the hands of the principal manufacturer and that no reversal of credit is warranted merely because such scrap is not brought back.
Conclusion: The demand for reversal of Cenvat credit was not sustainable, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where inputs are sent to a job-worker under Rule 4(5)(a) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, the principal manufacturer is not required to reverse credit on the inputs contained in waste and scrap generated at the job-worker's premises, as the rule does not impose any obligation to receive back such waste and scrap.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
