Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was sustainable when the duty and interest had already been paid and the case was covered by Section 11A(2B) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
Analysis: The dispute before the Tribunal was confined to penalty. The duty demand had already been paid with interest and had not been seriously contested in the appeal. In such a situation, Section 11A(2B) operated to treat the duty payment as final and the statutory foundation for invoking penalty under Section 11AC was not made out. The authorities relied upon by the parties on job work and removal of inputs or by-products were noted, but the decisive consideration was the prior payment of duty and interest together with the statutory effect of voluntary payment under Section 11A(2B).
Conclusion: Penalty under Section 11AC was not imposable and was set aside in favour of the assessee.