Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2018 (12) TMI 832 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Reassessment time-barred under Section 149; amendment cannot revive long-expired limitation, reassessment set aside after AO concession HC held reassessment for the relevant year was time-barred and the Revenue lacked jurisdiction to reopen it. Applying Supreme Court precedents, the court ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Reassessment time-barred under Section 149; amendment cannot revive long-expired limitation, reassessment set aside after AO concession

                          HC held reassessment for the relevant year was time-barred and the Revenue lacked jurisdiction to reopen it. Applying Supreme Court precedents, the court ruled the return became barred on the statutory cut-off and a later amendment to Section 149 could not revive limitation expired years earlier. The AO's concession that the assessee was a non-resident reinforced that the then applicable limitation regime governed. The petition was allowed and reassessment proceedings set aside in favour of the assessee.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Validity of reassessment notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
                          2. Applicability of the limitation period for reassessment under Section 149 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
                          3. Impact of amendments to Section 149 by the Finance Act, 2012 on concluded assessments.
                          4. Petitioner's residential status and its effect on the reassessment.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Validity of Reassessment Notice under Section 148:
                          The petitioner challenged the reassessment notice dated 24.03.2015 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 1998-99. The petitioner argued that the notice was time-barred and the Revenue had no jurisdiction to initiate reassessment proceedings. The petitioner contended that the reassessment was based on a suspicion that income had escaped assessment, which is not a valid ground for reopening a concluded assessment.

                          2. Applicability of the Limitation Period for Reassessment under Section 149:
                          The petitioner argued that the reassessment notice was barred by the limitation period prescribed under Section 149. Initially, Section 149 allowed reassessment within ten years from the end of the relevant assessment year, which was later reduced to six years by the Finance Act, 2001. Therefore, for the assessment year 1998-99, the limitation period expired on 31.03.2005. The petitioner contended that the reassessment notice issued in 2015 was beyond this limitation period.

                          3. Impact of Amendments to Section 149 by the Finance Act, 2012:
                          The Revenue argued that the reassessment notice was valid under the amended Section 149 (1)(c), introduced by the Finance Act, 2012, which extended the limitation period to sixteen years for income related to any asset located outside India. However, the petitioner argued that the amendment could not revive the limitation period for assessments that had already attained finality. The petitioner relied on the Supreme Court's decisions in K.M. Sharma vs. Income Tax Officer and S.S. Gadgil v. Lal & Co., which held that amendments to limitation periods cannot retrospectively reopen assessments that had already become time-barred.

                          4. Petitioner's Residential Status and its Effect on the Reassessment:
                          The petitioner, a senior citizen, was a non-resident/not ordinarily resident in India from AY 1984-85 to AY 2003-04. The petitioner clarified during search proceedings that he did not maintain any foreign bank accounts in his individual capacity but had settled an offshore trust with income earned outside India. The Revenue, however, contended that the petitioner failed to provide evidence of his non-resident status or the sources of income used to settle the trust. The Revenue argued that the reassessment was justified as the petitioner had financial interests in the offshore trust, which were not disclosed.

                          Conclusion:
                          The court held that the reassessment notice and subsequent proceedings were barred by limitation. The court emphasized that the law of limitation confers certainty and finality to legal proceedings and prevents reopening of concluded assessments unless the amended provision is expressly retrospective. The court found that the amendment to Section 149 by the Finance Act, 2012, could not retrospectively extend the limitation period for assessments that had already attained finality. The court quashed the reassessment notice and all consequent proceedings, allowing the petition without costs.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found