Tariff classification of electrically operated musical instruments under Heading 9208, with GST exemption denied for non-listed goods.

Electrically operated Drum with Bell and Zalar was treated as a mechanically operated musical article and classified under Heading 9208 of the Customs Tariff as a residual heading for musical instruments not elsewhere specified. The GST exemption under Sl. No. 143 of Notification No. 2/2017-Central Tax (Rate) was confined to indigenous handmade musical instruments specifically listed in Annexure II, and the product did not match those notified entries. The ruling also stated that an earlier VAT determination could not be used to extend the GST exemption, because the GST entry was not pari materia with the VAT provision.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the product "Electrically operated Drum with Bell and Zalar" is classifiable under Heading 9208 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. (ii) Whether the product is eligible for exemption under Sl. No. 143 of Notification No. 2/2017-Central Tax (Rate), as amended, for indigenous handmade musical instruments.

Issue (i): Whether the product "Electrically operated Drum with Bell and Zalar" is classifiable under Heading 9208 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.

Analysis: The product was found to be a mechanically operated musical article made by assembling drum, bell and zalar components, and it was known in the market by its specific description. For tariff interpretation, the notification provisions were to be read with the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 and the interpretative rules applicable to it. On that basis, the product was treated as falling under the residual musical-instrument heading covering musical instruments not elsewhere specified.

Conclusion: The product is classifiable under Heading 9208 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.

Issue (ii): Whether the product is eligible for exemption under Sl. No. 143 of Notification No. 2/2017-Central Tax (Rate), as amended, for indigenous handmade musical instruments.

Analysis: The exemption under Sl. No. 143 was held to be confined to indigenous handmade musical instruments specifically listed in Annexure II of the notification. The product did not correspond to the listed entries relied upon by the applicant and did not answer the description of the exempted goods. The earlier VAT determination was also held to be inapplicable because the GST exemption entry was not pari materia with the VAT entry.

Conclusion: The product is not eligible for exemption under Sl. No. 143 of Notification No. 2/2017-Central Tax (Rate), as amended.

Final Conclusion: The ruling confirms the product's classification under Heading 9208 and denies the claimed GST exemption for indigenous handmade musical instruments.

Ratio Decidendi: Where a GST exemption is confined to specifically listed goods, a product must strictly correspond to the notified description and the exemption cannot be extended by analogy from a different tax regime.

---