<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 517 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, GUJARAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361690</link>
    <description>Electrically operated Drum with Bell and Zalar was treated as a mechanically operated musical article and classified under Heading 9208 of the Customs Tariff as a residual heading for musical instruments not elsewhere specified. The GST exemption under Sl. No. 143 of Notification No. 2/2017-Central Tax (Rate) was confined to indigenous handmade musical instruments specifically listed in Annexure II, and the product did not match those notified entries. The ruling also stated that an earlier VAT determination could not be used to extend the GST exemption, because the GST entry was not pari materia with the VAT provision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2025 12:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523236" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 517 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, GUJARAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361690</link>
      <description>Electrically operated Drum with Bell and Zalar was treated as a mechanically operated musical article and classified under Heading 9208 of the Customs Tariff as a residual heading for musical instruments not elsewhere specified. The GST exemption under Sl. No. 143 of Notification No. 2/2017-Central Tax (Rate) was confined to indigenous handmade musical instruments specifically listed in Annexure II, and the product did not match those notified entries. The ruling also stated that an earlier VAT determination could not be used to extend the GST exemption, because the GST entry was not pari materia with the VAT provision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361690</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>