TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal rules for cellular provider on TDS and roaming charges, citing precedent and assessee-friendly tax principle.</h1> <h3>DCIT, TDS Circle And ITO (TDS), New Delhi Versus Idea Cellular Ltd.</h3> DCIT, TDS Circle And ITO (TDS), New Delhi Versus Idea Cellular Ltd. - TMI Issues:1. Failure to deduct TDS on commission payments to distributors.2. Failure to deduct TDS on roaming charges.3. Appeal against CIT(A) order regarding TDS liability.4. Applicability of judicial decisions on TDS liability.Issue 1: Failure to deduct TDS on commission payments to distributors:The appellant, a cellular service provider, did not deduct TDS on commission payments to distributors. The Assessing Officer held the appellant as an assessee in default under Section 201(1) for not deducting TDS on commission payments. The CIT(A) partly allowed the appeal. The Revenue contested, citing the retrospective application of Section 191 and the need for the Assessing Officer's order to stand. However, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, considering conflicting High Court decisions and the principle favoring the assessee in tax matters.Issue 2: Failure to deduct TDS on roaming charges:The appellant also failed to deduct TDS on roaming charges paid to other telecom operators for technical services. The Assessing Officer held the appellant in default under Section 201(1). The appellant argued that these payments did not qualify as fees for technical services as per judicial precedents. The Tribunal agreed with the appellant, citing the absence of human intervention in the roaming process and the nature of the services provided.Issue 3: Appeal against CIT(A) order regarding TDS liability:The Revenue's appeal against the CIT(A) order focused on the applicability of certain Supreme Court decisions. However, since the Tribunal had already ruled in favor of the appellant on the TDS issues, the Revenue's appeal was deemed infructuous and dismissed.Issue 4: Applicability of judicial decisions on TDS liability:Various judicial decisions, including those from the Delhi High Court, Karnataka High Court, and Rajasthan High Court, were cited to support arguments on TDS liability. The Tribunal considered these decisions, along with the principle favoring the assessee in tax matters, to determine the outcome of the appeals.In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeals related to TDS on commission payments and roaming charges while dismissing the Revenue's appeal. The orders were pronounced on 1st May 2018.
TaxTMI 