Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported business/data projectors were classifiable under CTH 85286100 as projectors of a kind solely or principally used in an automatic data processing system, or under CTH 85286900 as other projectors, and whether the benefit of the exemption notifications was available.
Analysis: The classification turned on the principal use of the goods. The technical literature showed that the projectors were designed for data projection and were primarily meant for use with computers, even though they also had features such as HDMI, USB, composite video and audio inputs. The presence of such additional connectivity did not alter their essential character or displace their principal use with automatic data processing systems. The reasoning in earlier Tribunal decisions on identical projector models and similar specifications was followed, holding that video compatibility or other ancillary features do not by themselves take the goods out of the tariff entry for projectors principally used with ADP systems.
Conclusion: The projectors were correctly classifiable under CTH 85286100 and not under CTH 85286900; the denial of exemption and the consequential demand, interest and penalties could not be sustained.