Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Authority classifies Data Projector models ZH 350, ZW350e, ZX 350e for customs benefits

        IN RE : AUDIO DISTRIBUTION HOUSE PVT. LTD.

        IN RE : AUDIO DISTRIBUTION HOUSE PVT. LTD. - 2023 (384) E.L.T. 603 (A. A. R. - Cus. - Mum.) Issues Involved:
        1. Classification of 'Data Projector' models ZH 350, ZW350e, ZX 350e.
        2. Applicability of Sr. No. 17 of Notification No. 24/2005-Customs, dated 1-3-2005, as amended.

        Detailed Analysis:

        Classification of 'Data Projector' Models ZH 350, ZW350e, ZX 350e:
        The applicant, M/s. Audio Distribution House Pvt. Ltd., sought an advance ruling on the classification of 'Data Projector' models ZH 350, ZW350e, ZX 350e. The applicant argued that these models are data projectors used in various professional settings like schools, business meetings, and conferences, and are designed to function with an Automatic Data Processing System (APDS). The features of these projectors include a native resolution ranging from 1024 x 768 to 1920 x 1080, brightness specifications between 3500-4000 ANSI lumens, and a contrast ratio of 30000:1. The applicant proposed classification under CTH 8528 62 00, which covers 'Projectors - capable of directly connecting to and designed for use with an automatic data processing machine of Heading 8471.'

        The applicant compared these data projectors with home theatre projectors, which generally support higher resolutions (4K UHD 3840 × 2160), higher contrast ratios (up to 12,00,000:1), and a native aspect ratio of 16:9. The applicant emphasized that the impugned devices are not home theatre projectors but data projectors designed primarily for use with an automatic data processing system.

        The Authority considered the features of the projectors, including their aspect ratio, native resolution, contrast ratio, and brightness. It was noted that the projectors have a native aspect ratio of 4:3, which is more suitable for documents and presentations, although they can be adjusted to 16:9 or 16:10 for adaptability purposes. The projectors also have lower native resolutions and contrast ratios compared to video projectors but higher brightness, making them suitable for well-lit environments.

        Applicability of Sr. No. 17 of Notification No. 24/2005-Customs:
        The Authority examined the relevant Customs Tariff Headings (CTH) and Chapter Notes. CTH 8528 covers 'Monitors and projectors, not incorporating television reception apparatus.' Sub-heading 8528 62 00 specifically covers 'Projectors; capable of directly connecting to and designed for use with an automatic data processing machine of heading 8471.' Chapter Note 6(E) to Chapter 84 states that machines working in conjunction with an automatic data processing machine and performing a specific function other than data processing are to be classified according to their respective functions.

        The Authority found that the projectors in question are designed for use with an automatic data processing machine, as evidenced by their computer compatibility standards and connection ports. The projectors are marketed as data projectors for business and educational purposes, supporting the applicant's claim for classification under sub-heading 8528 62 00.

        The Authority also considered the presence of additional ports like HDMI, Audio Out, USB-A, and RS-232, which could potentially classify the projectors under CTH 85286900. However, based on GRI Rule 3, which prefers the most specific description, and the product descriptions on the manufacturer's website, the Authority concluded that the principal use of the projectors is with automatic data processing machines.

        Conclusion:
        The Authority ruled that the Data Projector models ZH 350, ZW350e, ZX 350e are classifiable under sub-heading 8528 62 00 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. Consequently, these projectors are eligible to avail the benefit of Sr. No. 17 of Notification No. 24/2005-Customs, dated 1-3-2005, as amended, which exempts goods solely or principally used in an automatic data processing system of 8471 and falling under Heading 8528 62.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found