Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Compact Media Centre / K-Yan computer system was classifiable as a computer under Heading 8471 or as a video projector under Heading 8528 for customs tariff purposes.
Analysis: The equipment was found to be a computer system with its ordinary monitor function replaced by an in-built projection device used only as an output display. The projection system could not function in isolation and did not alter the essential character of the goods. The classification machinery therefore did not warrant resort to the residual rule for competing headings, since the item remained a computer with an additional display facility rather than a projector in commercial or technical understanding.
Conclusion: The goods were classifiable under Heading 8471 as computer systems and not under Heading 8528 as video projectors.
Final Conclusion: The classification adopted by the lower authorities was set aside and the assessee's declared classification was accepted.
Ratio Decidendi: For tariff classification, a machine retains the character of a computer where an in-built projector merely replaces the monitor as an output device and does not change the essential character of the goods.