Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Customs exemption granted for Optoma data projectors under specific classification</h1> <h3>IN RE : AUDIO DISTRIBUTION HOUSE PVT. LTD.</h3> IN RE : AUDIO DISTRIBUTION HOUSE PVT. LTD. - 2023 (383) E.L.T. 350 (A. A. R. - Cus. - Mum.) Issues Involved:1. Classification of data projectors Optoma X309ST, Optoma X319ST, Optoma W319ST, Optoma ZW350, and Optoma ZX300.2. Applicability of Sr. No. 17 of Notification No. 24/2005-Customs, dated 1-3-2005, as amended.Detailed Analysis:1. Classification of Data Projectors:The applicant, M/s. Audio Distribution House Pvt. Ltd., sought an advance ruling on the classification of specific models of Optoma data projectors. They argued that these projectors are principally meant for use with automatic data processing systems and should be classified under CTH 8528 62 00, which covers projectors capable of connecting directly to and designed for use with such systems. These projectors support various computer display standards and have features like HDMI, VGA, composite, audio-in/out, USB-A, and RS232 connections. The applicant compared their devices with home theatre projectors, which generally support higher resolutions and contrast ratios and are classified under CTH 8528 69 00. The applicant emphasized that their projectors are not home theatre projectors and provided several case laws to support their claim.The ruling authority considered the materials and submissions, noting the absence of comments from the jurisdictional Commissioner. The authority highlighted the differences between business/data projectors and video/home theatre projectors, noting that business projectors are generally brighter, have lower contrast ratios, and are designed to match computer or laptop screens. The authority referred to the General Interpretative Rules (GI Rules) and relevant Customs Tariff Headings (CTHs) to determine the classification. They noted that projectors designed to work with automatic data processing machines should be classified under Heading 8528. The authority also considered the product data sheets and the manufacturer's website descriptions, which indicated that the projectors are marketed as data projectors for business and educational purposes.The authority concluded that the projectors in question are designed for use with automatic data processing machines and possess features that differentiate them from video projectors. They ruled that the presence of additional features like HDMI and S-Video ports does not disqualify the projectors from being classified under CTH 8528 62 00. The ruling relied on previous case laws, including Commissioner of Customs v. Vardhman Technology Pvt. Ltd., which held that projectors with additional functions could still be classified under the relevant heading for data processing systems. Therefore, the authority ruled that the projectors are classifiable under sub-heading 8528 62 00.2. Applicability of Sr. No. 17 of Notification No. 24/2005-Customs:The applicant claimed eligibility for a nil rate of duty on the projectors under Sr. No. 17 of Notification No. 24/2005-Customs, which exempts goods solely or principally used in an automatic data processing system of Heading 8471 and falling under Heading 8528 62. The ruling authority confirmed that since the projectors are classifiable under sub-heading 8528 62 00 and are principally used with automatic data processing systems, they are entitled to the exemption provided by the notification.Conclusion:The ruling authority concluded that the projectors Optoma X309ST, Optoma X319ST, Optoma W319ST, Optoma ZW350, and Optoma ZX300 are classifiable under sub-heading 8528 62 00 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. Consequently, they are eligible to avail the benefit of Sr. No. 17 of Notification No. 24/2005-Customs, dated 1-3-2005, as amended.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found