TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the expression "Chief Metropolitan Magistrate" in Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 includes an Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate; (ii) Whether the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate and the District Magistrate are persona designata for the purposes of Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.
Issue (i): Whether the expression "Chief Metropolitan Magistrate" in Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 includes an Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate;
Analysis: The provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 governing metropolitan magistrates were read to show that the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate and the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate stand on the same footing in respect of judicial powers. The Court relied on the statutory scheme under Sections 16, 17 and 19 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on the principle that the office of Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate may be invested with the powers of the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate. As the function under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 is of a nature that can be exercised by a magistrate clothed with those powers, the expression used in Section 14 was construed broadly.
Conclusion: Yes. The expression "Chief Metropolitan Magistrate" in Section 14 includes an Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate.
Issue (ii): Whether the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate and the District Magistrate are persona designata for the purposes of Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.
Analysis: The Court held that the power under Section 14 is executory in nature and does not involve a quasi-judicial adjudication on disputes between the secured creditor and the borrower. Since the function is statutory and administrative in character, the Magistrates acting under Section 14 were not treated as persona designata. The Court further held that the statutory framework permits the High Court to authorise additional magistrates to exercise the same powers for expeditious disposal of applications.
Conclusion: No. The Chief Metropolitan Magistrate and the District Magistrate are not persona designata for the purposes of Section 14.
Final Conclusion: The petition succeeded and the statutory expression used in Section 14 was interpreted to enable functioning through Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrates and Additional District Magistrates, thereby supporting expeditious disposal of applications under the Act.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a statutory power under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 is executory and not adjudicatory, the magistrate exercising it is not persona designata and the expression naming the authority may be construed to include an additional magistrate vested with co-extensive judicial powers.
TaxTMI 
