Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2017 (11) TMI 963 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        ITAT rules on Section 14A disallowance & MAT computation, excludes strategic investments. The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee regarding disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing that only investments yielding exempt ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          ITAT rules on Section 14A disallowance & MAT computation, excludes strategic investments.

                          The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee regarding disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing that only investments yielding exempt income should be considered for disallowance calculations. The ITAT directed the AO to exclude strategic investments and adhere to judicial precedents. Additionally, the ITAT held that the disallowance under Section 14A should not be added to book profits for Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) computation under Section 115JB, following the Special Bench decision in ACIT v. Vireet Investment P Ltd. The matters were remanded to the AO for fresh computations in line with the ITAT's directives.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act.
                          2. Computation of book profits under Section 115JB for Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT).

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Disallowance under Section 14A:

                          - Facts and Background:
                          The assessee, an investor and dealer in shares and securities, earned dividend income claimed as exempt under Section 10(34). The assessee disallowed a portion of the expenditure under Section 14A but excluded administrative expenses. The Assessing Officer (AO) included administrative expenses and recalculated the disallowance using Rule 8D, resulting in a higher disallowance.

                          - CIT(A) Decision:
                          The CIT(A) directed the AO to determine a reasonable amount of disallowance under Section 14A, following the Bombay High Court's decision in Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd., which mandates a reasonable basis for such disallowance even before Rule 8D's applicability.

                          - ITAT Decision:
                          The ITAT referred to its previous rulings in the assessee's own cases for earlier years, where it was held that strategic investments made for controlling interest should not attract disallowance under Section 14A. The ITAT also considered the recent decisions of the Supreme Court and High Courts, emphasizing that only investments yielding exempt income should be considered for disallowance calculations. The matter was remanded to the AO for fresh computation, excluding strategic investments and adhering to the principles laid down in the cited judicial precedents.

                          2. Computation of Book Profits under Section 115JB:

                          - Facts and Background:
                          The assessee contended that disallowance computed under Section 14A should not be added to book profits for MAT computation under Section 115JB.

                          - CIT(A) Decision:
                          The CIT(A upheld the AO's inclusion of the Section 14A disallowance in the book profits for MAT computation.

                          - ITAT Decision:
                          The ITAT directed the AO to follow the Special Bench decision in ACIT v. Vireet Investment P Ltd., which held that disallowance under Section 14A should not be added to book profits for MAT purposes. The ITAT remanded the matter to the AO to recompute the book profits accordingly.

                          Separate Judgments and Application to Other Assessment Years:

                          - AY 2007-08:
                          The ITAT applied its decision for AY 2006-07 mutatis mutandis to AY 2007-08, allowing the appeal for statistical purposes.

                          - AY 2009-10:
                          The ITAT observed that the AO's disallowance under Rule 8D exceeded the total expenses claimed by the assessee. The ITAT directed the AO to compute the disallowance afresh, considering only those investments that yielded exempt income and excluding strategic investments.

                          - AY 2010-11:
                          The ITAT reiterated its stance on excluding stock-in-trade from disallowance calculations under Section 14A and upheld the CIT(A)'s exclusion of diminution in investment value from such disallowance.

                          - AY 2011-12:
                          The ITAT applied its decision for AY 2010-11 to AY 2011-12, allowing the appeal for statistical purposes.

                          Conclusion:
                          The ITAT's comprehensive analysis emphasizes the need for a reasonable and fact-specific approach in computing disallowances under Section 14A and their impact on book profits under Section 115JB, ensuring adherence to judicial precedents and statutory provisions. The matters were largely remanded to the AO for fresh computations in line with the ITAT's directions.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found