Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 applies to exempt dividend and interest arising from securities held by a bank as stock-in-trade.
Analysis: Section 14A disallows expenditure incurred in relation to income not forming part of total income, but its operation depends on a proximate connection between the expenditure and the earning of exempt income. The securities in question were held as stock-in-trade, and the income from their purchase and sale was business income. The dividend and interest earned from those securities were only incidental to the trading activity and were not the object for which the expenditure was incurred. On that footing, the expenditure was incurred for acquiring and dealing in stock-in-trade and not for earning the exempt dividend or interest. The distinction between investment and stock-in-trade was material, and rule 8D did not alter the position on these facts.
Conclusion: Section 14A was held to be inapplicable to the exempt income arising incidentally from the assessee's stock-in-trade, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Expenditure incurred for acquiring and trading in securities held as stock-in-trade is not expenditure incurred in relation to incidental exempt dividend or interest arising from those securities, so section 14A does not apply absent a proximate nexus with the exempt income.