Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal allows appeals for 2012-13 & 2013-14, vacates disallowance under Section 14A.

        Patel Engineering Ltd. (Successor of Patel Realty India Ltd.) Versus DCIT, CC-3 (4), Mumbai

        Patel Engineering Ltd. (Successor of Patel Realty India Ltd.) Versus DCIT, CC-3 (4), Mumbai - TMI Issues Involved:
        1. Disallowance of administrative expenses under Section 14A read with Rule 8D(2)(iii).
        2. Levy of interest under Sections 234B and 234C.

        Detailed Analysis:

        1. Disallowance of Administrative Expenses under Section 14A read with Rule 8D(2)(iii):

        - A.Y. 2012-13:
        The assessee, engaged in civil contracting and property development, filed its return declaring a total income of Rs. 23,09,96,770/-. During scrutiny, the Assessing Officer (A.O) noted that the assessee had made investments in shares and mutual funds and maintained a common pool of funds for all activities. The A.O proposed a disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D, which the assessee contested on multiple grounds, including the nature of investments being strategic and the availability of substantial own funds. The A.O, however, computed a disallowance of Rs. 24,83,627/-.

        On appeal, the CIT(A) partially accepted the assessee's contentions but held that disallowance under Section 14A was necessary due to the disposal of some strategic investments during the year. The CIT(A) directed the A.O to compute the disallowance considering these disposals.

        The Tribunal, upon further appeal, noted that the assessee did not receive any dividend income during the year. Citing precedents from the Delhi High Court and the ITAT Mumbai, the Tribunal concluded that no disallowance under Section 14A could be made in the absence of exempt income. The disallowance was vacated, and the appeal was allowed.

        - A.Y. 2013-14:
        The assessee filed its return declaring a total income of Rs. 23,68,77,700/-. The A.O disallowed Rs. 26,06,171/- under Section 14A, which the assessee contested, claiming no dividend income was received during the year. The CIT(A) erroneously noted a dividend income of Rs. 1.78 crores and directed the A.O to compute the disallowance accordingly.

        The Tribunal observed conflicting claims regarding the receipt of dividend income. The matter was remanded to the A.O for fresh adjudication to verify the actual dividend income and restrict the disallowance to the extent of such income. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.

        2. Levy of Interest under Sections 234B and 234C:

        - A.Y. 2012-13 and A.Y. 2013-14:
        The assessee contested the levy of interest under Sections 234B and 234C. However, the Tribunal's decision primarily focused on the disallowance under Section 14A and did not provide a detailed analysis of the interest levy. The appeals were allowed based on the primary issue of disallowance under Section 14A.

        Conclusion:
        The appeals for A.Y. 2012-13 and A.Y. 2013-14 were allowed, with the disallowance under Section 14A vacated for A.Y. 2012-13 and remanded for fresh adjudication for A.Y. 2013-14. The levy of interest under Sections 234B and 234C was not explicitly addressed in detail.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found