Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether disallowance under section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 can be made in a year in which the assessee has not earned any exempt income.
Analysis: The appeal arose under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 against deletion of a disallowance made under section 14A. The Court followed its earlier decisions holding that section 14A applies only when there is exempt income and that, in the absence of such income, no disallowance can be computed. The Court distinguished the Revenue's reliance on other Supreme Court decisions, holding that those authorities did not decide the precise question whether disallowance is permissible where no exempt income was earned during the relevant year. The Court also noted that the later decisions and connected cases, including Maxopp Investment Ltd., did not displace the settled view that no disallowance arises in a nil exempt income situation.
Conclusion: Disallowance under section 14A could not be made because the assessee had not earned any exempt income during the assessment year, and no substantial question of law arose.
Final Conclusion: The Revenue's challenge failed, and the deletion of the disallowance was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Section 14A disallowance cannot be invoked in a year in which no exempt income is earned, because there is then no expenditure attributable to income not forming part of total income.