Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Appellate Tribunal rules appellant liable for service tax on broadcast personnel fees reimbursement.</h1> <h3>M/s. Broadcast Engineering Consultants India Ltd. Versus C.S.T. Delhi</h3> M/s. Broadcast Engineering Consultants India Ltd. Versus C.S.T. Delhi - 2018 (9) G. S. T. L. 112 (Tri. - Del.) Issues:1. Liability of service tax on reimbursement of fees paid to broadcast personnel.2. Determination of whether the appellant acted as a pure agent.3. Interpretation of Section 67 of the Finance Act for valuation of taxable services.4. Analysis of relevant case laws on the concept of a pure agent.Issue 1: Liability of service tax on reimbursement of fees paid to broadcast personnelThe appellant provided taxable services to M/s. Prasar Bharti by supplying broadcast personnel and receiving a monthly fee along with reimbursement of fees paid to the personnel. The Department contended that service tax was applicable on the entire amount received by the appellant from M/s. Prasar Bharti. The appellant argued that they acted as an agent and the fees payable to broadcast personnel were reimbursements. The Tribunal noted that the appellant had paid service tax on their commission but not on the reimbursement of fees. The key issue was whether the reimbursement amount should be included in the taxable value for service tax purposes.Issue 2: Determination of whether the appellant acted as a pure agentThe appellant claimed to have operated as a pure agent for M/s. Prasar Bharti. To qualify as a pure agent, the service provider must meet specific conditions outlined in Rule 5(2) of the Service Tax Valuation Rules 2006. The adjudicating authority analyzed these conditions and found that the appellant did not satisfy the criteria to be considered a pure agent. Notably, there was no contractual agreement between the parties for the appellant to act as a pure agent, and the appellant did not receive authorization to make payments on behalf of M/s. Prasar Bharti. Consequently, the Tribunal concluded that the appellant could not be treated as a pure agent as defined in the rules.Issue 3: Interpretation of Section 67 of the Finance Act for valuation of taxable servicesSection 67 of the Finance Act deals with the valuation of taxable services for charging service tax. It specifies that the taxable value is the gross amount charged by the service provider for the service provided. The Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules 2006 allow for the exclusion of amounts received as a pure agent from the taxable value. The Tribunal referred to these provisions to determine the taxable value in the present case, emphasizing the importance of complying with the statutory requirements for valuation.Issue 4: Analysis of relevant case laws on the concept of a pure agentThe Tribunal examined case laws such as Neelav Jaiswal & Brothers and Jubiliant Enpro Pvt. Ltd. to understand the application of the pure agent concept in service tax matters. These cases highlighted that unless all conditions for being a pure agent are met, the service provider cannot exclude amounts received towards salary, provident fund, etc., from the taxable service. The Tribunal's decision aligned with the findings in these cases, emphasizing the importance of fulfilling the conditions for claiming pure agent status. Ultimately, the Tribunal upheld the impugned order, dismissing the appeal based on the analysis of relevant legal principles and case laws.This detailed analysis of the judgment from the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI provides a comprehensive overview of the issues involved and the Tribunal's reasoning in addressing each issue.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found