Anticipatory bail granted where documentary allegations lacked cogent material and custodial interrogation was not shown necessary.

Anticipatory bail was granted because the prosecution case rested mainly on documentary material, and there was no cogent prima facie evidence showing a specific incriminating role by the applicants or any direct or indirect benefit to them. The FIR did not clearly attribute active involvement to the Directors, the company was not arraigned, and the applicants had cooperated with the investigation. On that basis, the Court held that custodial interrogation was not shown to be necessary, and directed release in the event of arrest subject to conditions, with liberty to seek police remand in accordance with law.

---

---

Issues: Whether the applicants made out a case for anticipatory bail in view of the absence of cogent prima facie material connecting them with the alleged offences and the need, if any, for custodial interrogation.

Analysis: The application was considered on the basis of the prima facie material and the settled principles governing arrest and anticipatory bail. The allegations arose from a documentary transaction involving branch transfer forms, interstate forms and export forms, with the case largely turning on records and the role of various consignment sales agents. The FIR did not specifically spell out the active role of the Directors, the company itself was not arraigned, and no material of direct or indirect benefit to the applicants was shown. The Court found that the suspicion against the applicants was not supported by cogent material sufficient to justify custodial interrogation, particularly when they had cooperated with the investigation and the matter substantially rested on documents.

Conclusion: The applicants were entitled to anticipatory bail.

Final Conclusion: The applications succeeded and the applicants were directed to be released on bail in the event of arrest, subject to conditions and liberty to seek police remand in accordance with law.

Ratio Decidendi: Anticipatory bail may be granted where the prosecution case is primarily documentary, the applicants are not shown by cogent material to have played a specific incriminating role, and custodial interrogation is not demonstrated to be necessary.

---