https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347528 Anticipatory bail was granted because the prosecution case rested mainly on documentary material, and there was no cogent prima facie evidence showing a specific incriminating role by the applicants or any direct or indirect benefit to them. The FIR did not clearly attribute active involvement to the Directors, the company was not arraigned, and the applicants had cooperated with the investigation. On that basis, the Court held that custodial interrogation was not shown to be necessary, and directed release in the event of arrest subject to conditions, with liberty to seek police remand in accordance with law. en-us Mon, 28 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Sep 2017 18:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347528 Anticipatory bail was granted because the prosecution case rested mainly on documentary material, and there was no cogent prima facie evidence showing a specific incriminating role by the applicants or any direct or indirect benefit to them. The FIR did not clearly attribute active involvement to the Directors, the company was not arraigned, and the applicants had cooperated with the investigation. On that basis, the Court held that custodial interrogation was not shown to be necessary, and directed release in the event of arrest subject to conditions, with liberty to seek police remand in accordance with law. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 28 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347528