Bail parity requires substantially identical footing; serious prima facie allegations and prior conduct can justify refusal of release.

Bail parity is available only where the accused and co-accused stand on substantially identical material footing; non-speaking bail orders in favour of co-accused do not by themselves justify release. The Court also emphasized that discretionary bail must be assessed on the overall prima facie case, the accused's personal circumstances and conduct, and the societal interest involved. Where the record shows serious allegations of systematic misappropriation, alleged siphoning of funds, and an earlier pending embezzlement case, parity will fail and bail may properly be refused.

---

---

Issues: Whether the applicant was entitled to bail on the ground of parity with co-accused and in the absence of any sufficient basis to upset the Sessions Court's rejection of bail.

Analysis: The application was founded mainly on parity, but the orders granting bail to co-accused were non-speaking and did not establish that the applicant stood on the same footing. Bail could not be granted merely because a similar role was alleged; relevant factors also included the accused's personal circumstances, conduct, and the overall prima facie case. The record disclosed serious allegations of systematic misappropriation, a large amount allegedly siphoned off, and an earlier pending embezzlement case against the applicant. The Court also noted that the Sessions Court had given reasons for refusing bail and that discretionary bail jurisdiction had to be exercised cautiously, balancing individual liberty against societal interest.

Conclusion: The applicant was not entitled to bail. The request for parity failed, and the rejection of bail was sustained.

Final Conclusion: Bail was refused because the applicant could not establish parity with the released co-accused and the circumstances of the case did not justify release pending trial.

Ratio Decidendi: Parity in bail applies only where the accused are shown to stand on substantially identical footing on all material factors, and discretionary bail may be refused where the prima facie case and surrounding circumstances weigh against release.

---