Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported goods were entitled to exemption from Special Additional Duty in view of Notification No. 02/2003-Cus (NT) dated 06.01.2003 and the related exemption notifications.
Analysis: The imported goods fell within the period covered by Notification No. 02/2003-Cus (NT), which directed that no Special Additional Duty was payable on imports made between 02.06.98 and 31.07.98. The earlier view denying exemption on the footing that the imports preceded 17.07.98 was not accepted, as the later notification specifically covered the relevant period. The Commissioner (Appeals) had correctly applied the notification to grant the relief.
Conclusion: The exemption from Special Additional Duty was admissible and the department's challenge failed.
Final Conclusion: The appeal was dismissed, and the assessee retained the benefit of exemption from Special Additional Duty for the relevant imports.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a subsequent exemption notification expressly covers the relevant import period, the benefit must be granted according to its terms notwithstanding the department's reliance on an earlier restrictive view.