<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 514 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345402</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal and upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to grant Special Additional Duty (SAD) exemption to the respondent based on Notification 02/2003. The Tribunal found that the respondent qualified for SAD exemption under this notification, despite conflicting judgments in previous cases. The ruling emphasized the significance of Notification 02/2003 in providing exemption for imports during the specified period, leading to the dismissal of the department&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2017 13:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=481526" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 514 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345402</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal and upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to grant Special Additional Duty (SAD) exemption to the respondent based on Notification 02/2003. The Tribunal found that the respondent qualified for SAD exemption under this notification, despite conflicting judgments in previous cases. The ruling emphasized the significance of Notification 02/2003 in providing exemption for imports during the specified period, leading to the dismissal of the department&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345402</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>