Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether goods imported under the Duty Entitlement Pass Book Scheme and cleared under Notification No. 34/97 could be subjected to special additional duty of customs, and whether the non-debit of such special additional duty in the pass book amounted to breach of the notification conditions.
Analysis: Notification No. 34/97 granted exemption only from basic and additional customs duty, subject to debit in the DEPB pass book of the duty otherwise leviable on the goods covered by that notification. Special additional duty of customs was outside the scope of that exemption. The later exemption under Notification No. 34/98 covered special additional duty only for specified goods, including goods imported in terms of Notification No. 34/97 subject to the conditions, if any, specified therein. Since the debit contemplated by Notification No. 34/97 related only to the duties from which exemption was granted under that notification, failure to debit special additional duty could not be treated as non-compliance with its conditions.
Conclusion: The appellant was entitled to exemption from special additional duty under Notification No. 34/98, and the demand based on alleged non-debit of such duty in the DEPB pass book was unsustainable.