Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a partial partition of a Hindu undivided family could be recognised for income-tax purposes where the assessee had already been assessed in HUF status for the relevant period before the partition, even if the assessment order was passed after the date of partition.
Analysis: Section 171(9) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was enacted to negate recognition of partial partitions taking place after the statutory cut-off. The expression "hitherto assessed" was held to refer to whether the HUF had already been assessed as such for the period preceding the partition, and not merely to the date on which the assessment order was physically made. An assessment made later can still relate back to the assessment year for which it is passed, and therefore the later completion of assessment does not validate a partial partition that is otherwise hit by the statutory bar.
Conclusion: The partial partition could not be recognised; the issue was answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: For the purposes of Section 171(9) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, a partial partition after the cut-off date is not to be recognised where the HUF had already been assessed in that status for the period prior to the partition, and the subsequent date of completion of assessment does not alter that position.