<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 42 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34381</link>
    <description>Section 171(9) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 bars recognition of a partial partition of a Hindu undivided family after the statutory cut-off. The phrase &quot;hitherto assessed&quot; refers to whether the HUF had already been assessed in that status for the period preceding the partition, not to the date on which the assessment order was physically completed. A later assessment order can still relate back to the relevant assessment year, so delayed completion does not validate a partition otherwise hit by the statutory prohibition. The partial partition was therefore not recognised, and the issue was decided against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73004" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 42 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34381</link>
      <description>Section 171(9) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 bars recognition of a partial partition of a Hindu undivided family after the statutory cut-off. The phrase &quot;hitherto assessed&quot; refers to whether the HUF had already been assessed in that status for the period preceding the partition, not to the date on which the assessment order was physically completed. A later assessment order can still relate back to the relevant assessment year, so delayed completion does not validate a partition otherwise hit by the statutory prohibition. The partial partition was therefore not recognised, and the issue was decided against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34381</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>