Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2017 (2) TMI 463 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        ITAT Confirms Genuine Share Transactions, Allows Long-Term Capital Gains Exemption Under Income Tax Rules The ITAT Ahmedabad held that the transactions involving purchase and sale of shares were genuine, rejecting the revenue's claim that long-term capital ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          ITAT Confirms Genuine Share Transactions, Allows Long-Term Capital Gains Exemption Under Income Tax Rules

                          The ITAT Ahmedabad held that the transactions involving purchase and sale of shares were genuine, rejecting the revenue's claim that long-term capital gains were undisclosed income. The shares were duly transferred to the assessee's name and credited to the demat account from which they were sold. The tribunal found no evidence to suggest the shares were fictitious or the transactions were accommodation entries. Relying on direct evidence such as broker contract notes and bank receipts, the ITAT directed the AO to treat the surplus as long-term capital gains and allow the claimed exemption. The decision was in favor of the assessee.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Treatment of Long Term Capital Gains as undisclosed income.
                          2. Denial of exemptions on Long Term Capital Gains on the sale of shares.
                          3. Validity of assessment orders based on third-party statements without cross-examination.
                          4. The genuineness of transactions involving purchase and sale of shares.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Treatment of Long Term Capital Gains as Undisclosed Income:
                          The core issue in these appeals is the treatment of Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) as undisclosed income. The Assessing Officer (AO) reopened the assessments based on information from a search and seizure operation involving M/s. Mahasagar Securities Pvt Ltd, controlled by Shri Mukesh M. Choksi. Choksi admitted that his companies provided fraudulent entries for profit/loss on shares and securities transactions. The AO concluded that the appellants were beneficiaries of such accommodation entries, leading to the reopening of their assessments and treating the LTCG as undisclosed income.

                          2. Denial of Exemptions on Long Term Capital Gains:
                          The AO denied the exemptions on LTCG claimed by the assessees, treating the sale consideration as deemed income. The AO's findings were based on the statement of Shri Mukesh Choksi, who admitted to fraudulent activities. The AO dismissed the request for cross-examination of Choksi and relied on the fact that the transactions were not executed on the stock exchange, thus deeming them illegal and fraudulent.

                          3. Validity of Assessment Orders Based on Third-Party Statements Without Cross-Examination:
                          The assessees argued that the assessment orders were invalid as they were based on the statement of a third party (Choksi) without providing an opportunity for cross-examination. The Hon'ble Supreme Court's decision in the case of Andaman Timber Industries was cited, which held that not allowing cross-examination of witnesses whose statements form the basis of an order is a violation of natural justice, rendering the order null and void. The Tribunal agreed, stating that the AO's failure to provide cross-examination and reliance on Choksi's statement without confronting the assessees vitiated the assessment orders.

                          4. Genuineness of Transactions Involving Purchase and Sale of Shares:
                          The Tribunal examined the facts and found that the assessees had purchased shares through legitimate channels, paid consideration, and transferred shares to their demat accounts before selling them. There was no evidence suggesting that the shares were still with the assessees or that the sale consideration was returned in cash. The Tribunal concluded that the transactions were genuine, supported by broker’s contract notes, confirmation of receipt of sale proceeds through banking channels, and demat account records. The Tribunal emphasized that adverse inferences should not be drawn based on presumption and surmises.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal quashed the assessment orders, holding that the denial of cross-examination and reliance on Choksi's statement without confronting the assessees violated principles of natural justice. The Tribunal directed the AO to treat the surplus as LTCG and allow the exemptions claimed by the assessees. Consequently, all the appeals filed by the assessees were allowed.

                          Order Pronouncement:
                          The order was pronounced in the Court on 21st October, 2016, at Ahmedabad.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found