Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2020 (4) TMI 894 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal quashes assessment order for lack of natural justice, directs deletion of additions. The tribunal found the assessment order unsustainable as it violated the principles of natural justice by not allowing cross-examination or disclosing the ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal quashes assessment order for lack of natural justice, directs deletion of additions.

                          The tribunal found the assessment order unsustainable as it violated the principles of natural justice by not allowing cross-examination or disclosing the information used against the assessee. Consequently, the tribunal directed the deletion of additions under sections 68 and 69C, rendering the grounds related to interest and penalty proceedings infructuous. The importance of adhering to natural justice principles, including the right to cross-examine, was emphasized. The order was pronounced on 20.04.2020.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Legality of the assessment order under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act.
                          2. Addition of Rs. 3,43,62,880/- as unexplained cash credit under section 68 of the Income Tax Act.
                          3. Addition of Rs. 6,87,257/- as unexplained expenditure under section 69C of the Income Tax Act.
                          4. Charging of interest under sections 234A, 234B, 234C, and 234D of the Income Tax Act.
                          5. Initiation of penalty proceedings under section 274 read with section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Legality of the Assessment Order:
                          The assessee argued that the assessment order under section 143(3) was illegal, ultra vires, and passed without providing an opportunity for cross-examination or copies of the material used against the assessee. The tribunal noted that the Assessing Officer (AO) had relied heavily on the investigation report without offering the assessee a chance to counter it or conduct cross-examinations. The tribunal emphasized that the principle of natural justice was violated as the information used against the assessee was not disclosed, and no cross-examination was allowed. Consequently, the tribunal found the assessment order unsustainable on these grounds.

                          2. Addition as Unexplained Cash Credit:
                          The AO added Rs. 3,43,62,880/- to the assessee's income as unexplained cash credit under section 68, rejecting the long-term capital gain (LTCG) claim of Rs. 3,32,77,358/- and the cost of acquisition of Rs. 9,30,375/-. The AO based this on the investigation report, which suggested that the shares of M/s Premier Capital Services Ltd. were part of a bogus LTCG scheme. The assessee provided extensive documentation, including Demat account statements, contract notes, and bank statements, to substantiate the purchase and sale of shares. The tribunal noted that the AO did not conduct further investigations or provide the assessee with the investigation report's details. The tribunal cited several precedents where similar additions were deleted due to lack of evidence and failure to provide cross-examination. Consequently, the tribunal directed the deletion of the Rs. 3,43,62,880/- addition under section 68.

                          3. Addition as Unexplained Expenditure:
                          The AO added Rs. 6,87,257/- as unexplained expenditure under section 69C, treating it as commission paid for accommodation entries. The tribunal found this addition consequential to the primary issue of unexplained cash credit. Since the addition under section 68 was deleted, the tribunal also directed the deletion of the Rs. 6,87,257/- addition under section 69C.

                          4. Charging of Interest:
                          The assessee contested the charging of interest under sections 234A, 234B, 234C, and 234D. Given that the primary additions were deleted, these grounds became infructuous and did not require further adjudication.

                          5. Initiation of Penalty Proceedings:
                          The initiation of penalty proceedings under section 274 read with section 271(1)(c) was also contested. As the primary additions were deleted, this ground became infructuous and did not require further adjudication.

                          Conclusion:
                          The tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the additions under sections 68 and 69C and rendering the grounds related to interest and penalty proceedings infructuous. The tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to the principles of natural justice, particularly the right to cross-examine and access the materials used against the assessee. The order was pronounced on 20.04.2020.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found