Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2021 (3) TMI 342 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal partially allows appeal, deletes undisclosed income & capital gains exemptions, upholds excess jewelry addition The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of additions for undisclosed income of Rs. 20 crores, deemed dividend of Rs. ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal partially allows appeal, deletes undisclosed income & capital gains exemptions, upholds excess jewelry addition

                          The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of additions for undisclosed income of Rs. 20 crores, deemed dividend of Rs. 76,19,00,000/-, and disallowance of exemption on long-term capital gains of Rs. 16,24,68,072/-. However, the addition of Rs. 10,17,000/- towards excess jewelry found during the search was upheld.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer.
                          2. Addition of Rs. 20,00,00,000/- as undisclosed income.
                          3. Addition of Rs. 76,19,00,000/- as deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e).
                          4. Disallowance of exemption u/s 10(38) on long-term capital gains of Rs. 16,24,68,072/-.
                          5. Addition of Rs. 10,17,000/- towards excess jewelry found during the search.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer:
                          The issue regarding the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer was not explicitly discussed in the judgment. The primary focus was on the substantive additions made by the AO.

                          2. Addition of Rs. 20,00,00,000/- as Undisclosed Income:
                          The assessee argued that the addition was unwarranted and that the statement recorded during the survey did not have evidentiary value. The Tribunal noted that the addition was based on a statement recorded under section 132(4) during the search. The Tribunal emphasized that statements recorded during the search are important but must be supported by corroborative evidence. The Tribunal found that the discrepancies noted during the search were not linked to the assessee in his individual capacity but to the company. The Tribunal concluded that the addition was based on suspicion and surmise without corroborative evidence and directed the AO to delete the addition of Rs. 20 crores.

                          3. Addition of Rs. 76,19,00,000/- as Deemed Dividend u/s 2(22)(e):
                          The AO treated the cumulative credit balance in the books of M/s. AK Exports due to M/s. Infinity Jewellers and M/s. Mariyam Creations as deemed dividend, alleging circuitous transactions to divert funds from LJM to the assessee. The Tribunal found that the transactions between the concerns were normal business transactions and not loans or advances. The Tribunal noted that the AO's conclusion was based on conjectures and surmises without proper appreciation of facts. The Tribunal also observed that the funds were utilized during the course of business and did not benefit the assessee personally. Therefore, the Tribunal directed the AO to delete the addition of Rs. 76,19,00,000/-.

                          4. Disallowance of Exemption u/s 10(38) on Long-Term Capital Gains of Rs. 16,24,68,072/-:
                          The AO disallowed the exemption on the grounds that the gains were from penny stocks and part of an organized racket of bogus long-term capital gains. The Tribunal found that the AO's conclusion was based on suspicion and surmise without any specific evidence linking the assessee to the alleged scam. The Tribunal noted that the transactions were conducted through proper banking channels and demat accounts. The Tribunal emphasized that the AO failed to provide any specific evidence to controvert the assessee's claim. Therefore, the Tribunal directed the AO to delete the addition of Rs. 16,24,68,072/-.

                          5. Addition of Rs. 10,17,000/- Towards Excess Jewelry Found During the Search:
                          The AO added the value of excess diamonds found during the search as unexplained investment. The Tribunal noted that the assessee failed to substantiate the claim that the diamonds were brought by his wife at the time of marriage. The Tribunal upheld the AO's addition as the assessee did not provide any proper explanation or evidence. Therefore, the Tribunal confirmed the addition of Rs. 10,17,000/-.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, directing the deletion of additions towards undisclosed income of Rs. 20 crores, deemed dividend of Rs. 76,19,00,000/-, and disallowance of exemption on long-term capital gains of Rs. 16,24,68,072/-. However, the Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 10,17,000/- towards excess jewelry found during the search.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found