Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2024 (3) TMI 710 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Assessee wins appeal as additions under Section 68 for penny stock gains and loan transactions deleted due to insufficient evidence ITAT Mumbai allowed the assessee's appeal on three grounds. First, the addition under Section 68 for LTCG exemption on penny stock sales was deleted as ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Assessee wins appeal as additions under Section 68 for penny stock gains and loan transactions deleted due to insufficient evidence

                          ITAT Mumbai allowed the assessee's appeal on three grounds. First, the addition under Section 68 for LTCG exemption on penny stock sales was deleted as tax authorities failed to establish the assessee's involvement in manipulative activities or connection to share price rigging. Second, the addition under Section 68 for alleged bogus loan transactions was reversed since the assessee demonstrated genuine transactions by providing confirmations, bank statements, and evidence of loan repayments with interest. The assessment was primarily based on a retracted statement. Third, interest expense disallowance was also deleted as it was consequential to the allowed loan transactions.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Treatment of sale consideration from shares as bogus accommodation entry.
                          2. Addition of unsecured loan as unexplained cash credit.
                          3. Disallowance of interest expenditure under section 57.

                          Summary:

                          Issue 1: Treatment of Sale Consideration from Shares as Bogus Accommodation Entry
                          The assessee's sale consideration of Rs. 4,59,10,500 from shares of Greencrest Financial Services Ltd. was treated as a bogus accommodation entry by the Assessing Officer (AO). The AO alleged that the Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) was non-genuine and added it as unexplained credits under section 68 read with section 115BBE of the Income Tax Act. The AO's conclusion was based on various parameters such as offline purchase of non-listed shares, unrealistic purchase price, and findings from the SEBI report. The AO issued a show cause notice to the assessee, who failed to substantiate the genuineness of the transactions. The AO relied on judicial precedents to support the addition. The CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision, applying the theory of human probabilities and preponderance of probabilities, concluding that the transactions were sham and aimed at evading taxes.

                          Issue 2: Addition of Unsecured Loan as Unexplained Cash Credit
                          The AO added Rs. 1,25,00,000 as unexplained cash credit under section 68, considering loans from entities linked to Jagdish Purohit Group as non-genuine. The AO based this on the investigation report and statements from Jagdish Purohit, who admitted to providing accommodation entries through shell companies. The assessee provided confirmations, bank statements, and other documents to prove the genuineness of the loans. However, the AO and CIT(A) held that the assessee failed to prove the creditworthiness and genuineness of the transactions, relying on the theory of human probabilities and judicial precedents.

                          Issue 3: Disallowance of Interest Expenditure under Section 57
                          The AO disallowed Rs. 62,81,903 of interest expenditure claimed by the assessee, stating that the loans themselves were non-genuine. The AO argued that since the loans were treated as bogus, the interest on such loans could not be allowed as a deduction under section 57 or section 37(1) of the Act. The CIT(A) upheld the disallowance, noting that the assessee failed to prove the nexus between the interest income and expenses and the genuineness of the loans.

                          Tribunal's Decision:
                          The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, holding that:
                          1. The AO and CIT(A) failed to bring on record any material linking the assessee to dubious transactions or entry operators. The Tribunal found no discrepancies in the documents submitted by the assessee and relied on judicial precedents to conclude that the LTCG was genuine.
                          2. The Tribunal observed that the assessee had provided sufficient evidence to prove the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the unsecured loans. The repayment of loans along with interest further supported the genuineness of the transactions.
                          3. Since the addition of unsecured loans was deleted, the disallowance of interest expenditure was also consequentially deleted.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the additions made under sections 68 and 57, and upheld the genuineness of the LTCG and unsecured loans.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found