Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondent was entitled to Cenvat credit on capital goods received before the period of trial production and commercial production, despite a short subsequent period of conditional exemption for the final product.
Analysis: The final product was classifiable under Chapter Heading 68114010 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and was ordinarily dutiable. The exemption was only conditional and was availed for a limited subsequent period. Credit eligibility for capital goods was linked to the dutiability of the final product on the date the capital goods were received. A later temporary exemption did not, by itself, extinguish the right to credit, and the rules governing credit on capital goods did not support forfeiture merely because the credit was not taken during the same period.
Conclusion: The respondent was entitled to the Cenvat credit and the Revenue's challenge failed.